Now Playing Tracks

Graffiti… Street Art… And the Shameless Self Promoter Art

I know all about the arguments that graffiti is the only real discipline and street artists are posers and so the story goes.  I got into street art because of the anti establishment meaning of it.  I am a firm believer that gallery’s are very parasitic and control and use artists when it should be the other way around.  Artists created art before the existence of gallery’s but gallery’s do nothing without artists.  Now I have been in shows, and that has given me the understanding that only independent shows seem to have a pulse on what street art and graffiti are.  In my opinion the concept of the white box is a bit too antiquated and museum like to represent the feel of the street.  Street art/Graffiti do not belong in these spaces.  The attempt to use pieces of the street as part of the art often just looks like someone hanging garbage on a wall.  Sometimes it works, mostly no.

It seems that the streets have taken a turn.  Perhaps the popularity of that Gift Shop movie has flooded the scene with individuals who think, it’s just that easy to be somebody.  I have seen a real change happen over the past few years.  People calling themselves artists who only take other peoples photos paste them on walls and get accolades for doing this.  1: what makes this person an artist? 2: When did an anti establishment concept become so establishment?  

Using the streets as a stepping stone to get into a gallery many have gained a sort of respect for using someone else’s image ad nauseum and it seems that this respect is granted only by the amount displayed.  Using a dead photographers popular photo as your own, writing street addition, or leaving a contact are only a few examples of the ills of the scene.  These people are not artists, they are self promoters…  advertisers.  I understand the point and merit of using the same image and wanted to get the image up as much as possible, but where does it leave the scene when it becomes so watered down?

There are a few artists I am no fan of, but I would still give them respect for putting a little bit of thought into their work.  We are all shameless self promoters, but some of us at least have a little talent.

I was handcuffed for putting sand in a box similar to this one.  Turns out that is littering and until the officer can figure out what it was you were doing illegal you must remain in handcuffs.  I think I will fight that summons.
Zoom Info
Camera
iPhone 5
ISO
50
Aperture
f/2.4
Focal Length
4mm

I was handcuffed for putting sand in a box similar to this one.  Turns out that is littering and until the officer can figure out what it was you were doing illegal you must remain in handcuffs.  I think I will fight that summons.

This past weekend there was some awards show on I can’t for the life of me remember what it was all about.  I watched about 8 minutes of it at my local bar at which point I already had a few, some think I am an alcoholic, I say “SHAME ON YOU” it’s professional drunk!, and I thought it would be a lot of fun to have “The Street Art and Graffiti Anti Awards Awards Show”.  Then I sobered up and realized it is a terrible idea, and yet what fun it would be to put together a party honoring some of the cast of characters that make AND break art on the streets.  But, what would some categories be?

“Most Ups”, “Best Tag”, “Best sticker…  printed and hand done?

How about these? 
“Best use of Collage” “Biggest Beef” “Most Graff hoes” “Most Innovative”

Or the best of all, the ones that we all think about, the ones we can all have our own answer for
“Worst use of Collage” “Most Props off of Someone Else’s Photograph”  ”Least effort” “Lamest attempt at …”
Now those are some we can really sink our teeth into. 

Didn’t realize these were so popular to do these days.  it is good to have something out finally after so many weeks of stagnation.  It also felt good to get handcuffed for pouring sand inside in order to weigh down and keep from falling over.  Actually, my hand was twisted and they refused to fix for me, but really it does feel good to know the law without being a total dick to police.

More recently I feel that collaborations are not the direction art should be taking.  More often than not they look as if one image was splattered over another to create a muddy mess.  Since a lot of street art takes from Warhol and Basquiat it seems artists have to follow those footsteps and do what they did.  I have decided that collaborations are not the direction I would like to continue.
This is one of my possible last collaborations.  It is one of the few that I see working.  Both artists are represented in the piece but one does not dominate nor does it seem out of place.  The reflective paint used by Matt Siren gives the piece an interactive quality to the viewer.  From different angles each image takes dominance or fades away.
Zoom Info
ISO
250
Aperture
f/2.8
Exposure
1/15th
Focal Length
3mm

More recently I feel that collaborations are not the direction art should be taking.  More often than not they look as if one image was splattered over another to create a muddy mess.  Since a lot of street art takes from Warhol and Basquiat it seems artists have to follow those footsteps and do what they did.  I have decided that collaborations are not the direction I would like to continue.

This is one of my possible last collaborations.  It is one of the few that I see working.  Both artists are represented in the piece but one does not dominate nor does it seem out of place.  The reflective paint used by Matt Siren gives the piece an interactive quality to the viewer.  From different angles each image takes dominance or fades away.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union